User Menu Search
Close

What is the "Son of Man" in Mark 2:23-28

Was Jesus referring to himself, and if so in what sense?

  • 16 October 2015
  • Author: Scott Cherry
  • Number of views: 6628
  • 3 Comments

In Mark 2:23-28 Jesus uses the term "Son of Man" and "Lord of the Sabbath".  Was Jesus referring to himself in this passage? If he was by the former title then he also was by the latter title.  In the New Testament only Jesus ever referred to himself by this term, therefore Mark 2 cannot be the exception.

The Philosophy of Intelligent Design, part 3

Why it is Unreasonable to Exclude ID from Institutional Science

  • 22 December 2015
  • Author: Scott Cherry
  • Number of views: 7161
  • 0 Comments
Regardless of scientist's personal views on the subject, public institutions highly favor evolution in the name of pure science, and disfavor Intelligent Design due to its religious implications.  If it is any sort of rule it is a philosophical one, not a scientific one. But is it a fair and a reasonable one? And is it truly scientific?  With support from philosopher Thomas Nagel, I argue that it is not.  The prevailing institutional science of origins has unfairly “ruled out” a priori all possible causes that are not strictly naturalistic (i.e. mindless and purposeless) as pseudo-science.  Not even false per se, just disallowed.  This discussion will give special attention to the notion of irreducible complexity that Dr. Michael Behe develops in his book, "Darwin's Black Box".

The Philosophy of Intelligent Design, part 2

Why it is Unreasonable to Exclude ID from Institutional Science

  • 22 December 2015
  • Author: Scott Cherry
  • Number of views: 7131
  • 0 Comments

Regardless of scientist's personal views on the subject, public institutions highly favor evolution in the name of pure science, and disfavor Intelligent Design due to its religious implications.  If it is any sort of rule it is a philosophical one, not a scientific one. But is it a fair and a reasonable one? And is it truly scientific?  With support from philosopher Thomas Nagel, I argue that it is not.  The prevailing institutional science of origins has unfairly “ruled out” a priori all possible causes that are not strictly naturalistic (i.e. mindless and purposeless) as pseudo-science.  Not even false per se, just disallowed.  This discussion will give special attention to the notion of irreducible complexity that Dr. Michael Behe develops in his book, "Darwin's Black Box".

The Philosophy of Intelligent Design, part 1

Why it is Unreasonable to Exclude ID from Institutional Science

  • 22 December 2015
  • Author: Scott Cherry
  • Number of views: 7244
  • 0 Comments
Regardless of scientist's personal views on the subject, public institutions highly favor evolution in the name of pure science, and disfavor Intelligent Design due to its religious implications.  If it is any sort of rule it is a philosophical one, not a scientific one. But is it a fair and a reasonable one? And is it truly scientific?  With support from philosopher Thomas Nagel, I argue that it is not.  The prevailing institutional science of origins has unfairly “ruled out” a priori all possible causes that are not strictly naturalistic (i.e. mindless and purposeless) as pseudo-science.  Not even false per se, just disallowed.  This discussion will give special attention to the notion of irreducible complexity that Dr. Michael Behe develops in his book, "Darwin's Black Box".

Reflections on Islamophobia

by Dan Kersey

  • 27 December 2015
  • Author: Scott Cherry
  • Number of views: 7039
  • 0 Comments
I recently attended an event at a local mosque on the topic of Islamophobia. Bear in mind the recent negative images of Islam in the news; the Paris and San Bernardino terror attacks, the crisis in Europe as that continent, already struggling to integrate large Muslim minorities, absorbs 1,000,000 mostly Muslim refugees, and all this to the backdrop of the ongoing atrocities of ISIS. Additionally, being that 2015 is headed into a presidential election year, you have presidential candidates vying to outdo each other in their denunciations of Islam. So when I learned of this event, I figured I would have to go; both in that I feel it is important reach out and bridge the gulf between myself and the “other” in my midst, but also just for the thrill; maybe produced by the vulnerability of hearing “their” side of the story and on “their” turf. What I heard, saw, and learned I feel is worth passing along, so here is my report.
RSS
12345678910Last

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2024 by Tao and Tawheed
Back To Top